<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Greasemonkey vs. iStock</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.jayhollywood.com.au/greasemonkey-vs-istock/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.jayhollywood.com.au/greasemonkey-vs-istock/</link>
	<description>Jay Hollywood Freelancer</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 17 Aug 2010 23:58:30 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.1</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Sandoer</title>
		<link>http://www.jayhollywood.com.au/greasemonkey-vs-istock/comment-page-1/#comment-838</link>
		<dc:creator>Sandoer</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 17 Aug 2010 23:58:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.jayhollywood.com.au/?p=611#comment-838</guid>
		<description>Jay,

I didn&#039;t think it was working either. But I signed in, and BAM! Like a charm.

Thank you, by the way! I&#039;ve loved this script for a while now. keep up the great work!

Sandoer</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Jay,</p>
<p>I didn&#8217;t think it was working either. But I signed in, and BAM! Like a charm.</p>
<p>Thank you, by the way! I&#8217;ve loved this script for a while now. keep up the great work!</p>
<p>Sandoer</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jay</title>
		<link>http://www.jayhollywood.com.au/greasemonkey-vs-istock/comment-page-1/#comment-837</link>
		<dc:creator>Jay</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 17 Aug 2010 01:22:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.jayhollywood.com.au/?p=611#comment-837</guid>
		<description>Hi Miko,

It&#039;s seems to be working for me still - can I ask what browser/OS you are using?

Cheers,


Jay</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Miko,</p>
<p>It&#8217;s seems to be working for me still &#8211; can I ask what browser/OS you are using?</p>
<p>Cheers,</p>
<p>Jay</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Miko</title>
		<link>http://www.jayhollywood.com.au/greasemonkey-vs-istock/comment-page-1/#comment-833</link>
		<dc:creator>Miko</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 14 Aug 2010 10:57:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.jayhollywood.com.au/?p=611#comment-833</guid>
		<description>Can&#039;t get the script to work with their new website. :(</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Can&#8217;t get the script to work with their new website. <img src='http://www.jayhollywood.com.au/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_sad.gif' alt=':(' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tomáš Reichmann</title>
		<link>http://www.jayhollywood.com.au/greasemonkey-vs-istock/comment-page-1/#comment-830</link>
		<dc:creator>Tomáš Reichmann</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 04 Aug 2010 13:08:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.jayhollywood.com.au/?p=611#comment-830</guid>
		<description>This script is awesome. Now, if I want a nice preview for a client with large picture background (for example) I do this:

1. switch to fullscreen (F11)
2. printscreen the enlarged versions so that I have everything
3. assamble and crop the images to make a single layer
4. switch to quick mask mode
5. paste a pattern of the watermark (with a safety margin)
6. switch back to load the selection
7. Content-aware fill and ...

Voila!
I have a big preview image without watermark and with only a few visible minor errors.

BTW, If you dont have the CS5 (or later) and therefor the content-aware fill, it is possible to use the patch tool with similar results.

You can have the pattern here: http://storage.tomasreichmann.cz/istockphoto-watermark-mask.pat

{ You might need to resize the pattern if so just use a layer with pattern fill, rasterize and paste into quickmask }

I always buy the picture in the end but during mock up it might be these extra 5 minutes that persuade the client without having to buy the picture you might end up not using. :-)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This script is awesome. Now, if I want a nice preview for a client with large picture background (for example) I do this:</p>
<p>1. switch to fullscreen (F11)<br />
2. printscreen the enlarged versions so that I have everything<br />
3. assamble and crop the images to make a single layer<br />
4. switch to quick mask mode<br />
5. paste a pattern of the watermark (with a safety margin)<br />
6. switch back to load the selection<br />
7. Content-aware fill and &#8230;</p>
<p>Voila!<br />
I have a big preview image without watermark and with only a few visible minor errors.</p>
<p>BTW, If you dont have the CS5 (or later) and therefor the content-aware fill, it is possible to use the patch tool with similar results.</p>
<p>You can have the pattern here: <a href="http://storage.tomasreichmann.cz/istockphoto-watermark-mask.pat" rel="nofollow">http://storage.tomasreichmann.cz/istockphoto-watermark-mask.pat</a></p>
<p>{ You might need to resize the pattern if so just use a layer with pattern fill, rasterize and paste into quickmask }</p>
<p>I always buy the picture in the end but during mock up it might be these extra 5 minutes that persuade the client without having to buy the picture you might end up not using. <img src='http://www.jayhollywood.com.au/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':-)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Emma H.</title>
		<link>http://www.jayhollywood.com.au/greasemonkey-vs-istock/comment-page-1/#comment-481</link>
		<dc:creator>Emma H.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 06 Jul 2010 14:01:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.jayhollywood.com.au/?p=611#comment-481</guid>
		<description>I&#039;ve always been a fan of iStock for stock photography. Will be trying greasemonkey and see if it works for me. thanks!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;ve always been a fan of iStock for stock photography. Will be trying greasemonkey and see if it works for me. thanks!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Charlie</title>
		<link>http://www.jayhollywood.com.au/greasemonkey-vs-istock/comment-page-1/#comment-307</link>
		<dc:creator>Charlie</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 14 Mar 2010 22:27:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.jayhollywood.com.au/?p=611#comment-307</guid>
		<description>B-rrrilliant! God bless you Jay.

This is going to save me (as well as a lot of designers out there) a lot of time!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>B-rrrilliant! God bless you Jay.</p>
<p>This is going to save me (as well as a lot of designers out there) a lot of time!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: MJ, Berlin</title>
		<link>http://www.jayhollywood.com.au/greasemonkey-vs-istock/comment-page-1/#comment-259</link>
		<dc:creator>MJ, Berlin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 28 Feb 2010 16:12:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.jayhollywood.com.au/?p=611#comment-259</guid>
		<description>Hi Jay,

thank you for this script. Works like a charme.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Jay,</p>
<p>thank you for this script. Works like a charme.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jay</title>
		<link>http://www.jayhollywood.com.au/greasemonkey-vs-istock/comment-page-1/#comment-229</link>
		<dc:creator>Jay</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 17 Feb 2010 00:52:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.jayhollywood.com.au/?p=611#comment-229</guid>
		<description>@Paul, @Cynthia - the script seems to still be working fine for me - what Firefox version / OS are you using?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@Paul, @Cynthia &#8211; the script seems to still be working fine for me &#8211; what Firefox version / OS are you using?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Cynthia LaLuna</title>
		<link>http://www.jayhollywood.com.au/greasemonkey-vs-istock/comment-page-1/#comment-227</link>
		<dc:creator>Cynthia LaLuna</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 16 Feb 2010 19:34:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.jayhollywood.com.au/?p=611#comment-227</guid>
		<description>Yep, script seems broken now. Waaaaah.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yep, script seems broken now. Waaaaah.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Frank</title>
		<link>http://www.jayhollywood.com.au/greasemonkey-vs-istock/comment-page-1/#comment-199</link>
		<dc:creator>Frank</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 08 Feb 2010 22:04:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.jayhollywood.com.au/?p=611#comment-199</guid>
		<description>Oh. Yeah.
THANKS!!!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Oh. Yeah.<br />
THANKS!!!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
