Comments for Jay Hollywood

Comment on Moving Forward by Anju Dave

Anju Dave — Thu, 24 Mar 2011 22:42:17 +0000

Completely a distant person, having landed on your page, I was just imbibing your… sort of dramatic Hollywood name, the new name for your company and the people’s comments here.

Honestly, I did not feel elated with Humaan so much, until I went on the site and found the amazing expressions in the logo which completely detail the philosophy behind. It is definitely cool!

On Chandan’s comment : Though there is nothing against the name Hollywood but I think one should not mar branding for the sake of debatable “keyword in the domain name” for SEO

About sticking around with old one, I guess fertile minds keep evolving and they should not stop…:)

Comment on Greasemonkey vs. iStock by Brian

Brian — Wed, 22 Dec 2010 03:59:36 +0000

Seems a bit dodgy since iStockphoto’s redesign a few weeks back…but better than nothing! Thanks for this!

Comment on Why you should hire a freelancer by Adham Dannaway

Adham Dannaway — Tue, 30 Nov 2010 08:56:41 +0000

I think that these days more and more companies are looking to freelancers for website design work, especially those with solid portfolios and experience. There are of course a huge range of web design freelancers with different levels of skills and experience. I guess that some clients feel that design agencies are a safer option for them. You’re definitely right in saying that freelancers have a lot to offer, mainly because of the vast experience they have had.

Comment on The 30 minute logo. by Logo-Reviews

Logo-Reviews — Thu, 18 Nov 2010 14:00:31 +0000

I also agree with what you did Jay. It’s hard to feel good about designing a site with a crap logo.
In the clients shoes I would have immediately felt cheated and that this is not what I asked for – if it looked anything less than awesome (and obviously it does look awesome). However giving them the option to quickly revert to the original lets them feel like they are still in control.

What you did was a win win for yourself and the client. You’ll benefit from the positive word of mouth that you get. And I don’t think that they’ll be overly demanding if you get the chance to work with them again – besides you’ll probably find a way to quickly over-deliver next time as well.

Comment on Greasemonkey vs. iStock by OsiriO

OsiriO — Thu, 28 Oct 2010 22:23:25 +0000

SUPERB !
I was looking for somethimg like this for over 2 years… I’ve seen it on others preview and did not know how the did it.
Thanks a lot !

Comment on Greasemonkey vs. iStock by Lauren

Lauren — Tue, 26 Oct 2010 10:47:33 +0000

Thanks Jay

This is such a practical tool and so handy. Once logged in, it worked. I am sure I shall just love using this from here onwards.

Regards
Lauren

Comment on Why you should hire a freelancer by Alberto

Alberto — Thu, 30 Sep 2010 14:20:32 +0000

Excellent Jay! I was about to write something similar but you’ve already done it in high fashion! Clear and simple. You could have added that many times the client is basically hiring a freelancer anyway cause most of the companies are very likely to outsource that job to someone else. The client will have more difficulty communicating his goals and will pay both the freelancer and the mediator (i.e. the design company). Cheers!

Comment on Greasemonkey vs. iStock by Sandoer

Sandoer — Tue, 17 Aug 2010 23:58:30 +0000

Jay,

I didn’t think it was working either. But I signed in, and BAM! Like a charm.

Thank you, by the way! I’ve loved this script for a while now. keep up the great work!

Sandoer

Comment on Greasemonkey vs. iStock by Jay

Jay — Tue, 17 Aug 2010 01:22:43 +0000

Hi Miko,

It’s seems to be working for me still – can I ask what browser/OS you are using?

Cheers,

Jay

Comment on Greasemonkey vs. iStock by Miko

Miko — Sat, 14 Aug 2010 10:57:52 +0000

Can’t get the script to work with their new website.